<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pronunciation of &#8216;Divisive&#8217;?</title>
	<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html</link>
	<description>Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed (μεταμορφουσθε - metamorphousthe) by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will. Romans 12:2</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: rc</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-514</link>
		<author>rc</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-514</guid>
					<description>An English major, I, too, questioned the pronunciation of the word 'divisive'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An English major, I, too, questioned the pronunciation of the word &#8216;divisive&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-515</link>
		<author>Nik</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-515</guid>
					<description>This is a new issue which has recently sprung up….   For many years the word was pronounced with a long I, until recently. More and more people are beginning to pronounce it as it probably should be pronounced.  The example I would give is the word you thought he might have erroneously started to say, DIVISION, with a short I.  There are some scholars who would say this is the proper pronunciation,  but both are correct.  DIVIDE has a long I, but is not  a good example of why the word DIVISIVE should be pronounced with a long I, as it ends with a simple vowel, not –ion –ive, etc… The English language has many words like DIVISIVE, which have multiple pronunciations, i.e. schedule, harass, extraordinary…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a new issue which has recently sprung up….   For many years the word was pronounced with a long I, until recently. More and more people are beginning to pronounce it as it probably should be pronounced.  The example I would give is the word you thought he might have erroneously started to say, DIVISION, with a short I.  There are some scholars who would say this is the proper pronunciation,  but both are correct.  DIVIDE has a long I, but is not  a good example of why the word DIVISIVE should be pronounced with a long I, as it ends with a simple vowel, not –ion –ive, etc… The English language has many words like DIVISIVE, which have multiple pronunciations, i.e. schedule, harass, extraordinary…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-516</link>
		<author>Jamie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-516</guid>
					<description>I've only ever heard it pronounced like you have.  I just looked it up on merriam-webster.com and the pronunciation key shows it like we say it.  

Okay, my take on Obama... he totally agrees with his pastor.  His pastor hasn't suddenly changed, his views have always been such.  So why, if Obama didn't agree with Rev. Wright did he ever go to his church in the first place.  I think Obama is a great orator and very savvy, much like Clinton, who I also think was a liar.  But, that's just my not so humble opinion.  

I feel very torn though because I don't see a good option.  I will admit to liking Ron Paul though... I know he doesn't have a chance though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only ever heard it pronounced like you have.  I just looked it up on merriam-webster.com and the pronunciation key shows it like we say it.  </p>
<p>Okay, my take on Obama&#8230; he totally agrees with his pastor.  His pastor hasn&#8217;t suddenly changed, his views have always been such.  So why, if Obama didn&#8217;t agree with Rev. Wright did he ever go to his church in the first place.  I think Obama is a great orator and very savvy, much like Clinton, who I also think was a liar.  But, that&#8217;s just my not so humble opinion.  </p>
<p>I feel very torn though because I don&#8217;t see a good option.  I will admit to liking Ron Paul though&#8230; I know he doesn&#8217;t have a chance though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dones</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-517</link>
		<author>Dones</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-517</guid>
					<description>Alright, my take on the pastor deal: Obama was being totally honest and said as much as he thought the public could take on the subject--possibly more. I think he came to the church, learned about Jesus, believed...and eventually may have begun to notice that his pastor was talking about things outside the core truth of the Gospel (i.e. opinions on subjects independent of the Gospel) and disagreed with him. It could have been an epiphany (Wow, I never realized my pastor was a racist) or it could have been an unnoticeably gradual realization. I'm supposing that one of these would be the case, but I suspect that as Obama was developing his own opinions on the world he would come to church and hear the pastor proclaim the good news and love on the congregation, but also inject his political commentary. If Obama is anything like people I know, he could continue loving and respecting (for the most part) the pastor and continue being a member of his church, all while disagreeing on non-salvation-related subjects.

I'm not saying Obama is or has been right to stick with the church &#038; former pastor. I'm saying I understand &#038; respect his explanation of things. If I'm being hoodwinked here, so be it. Time will prove whether I'm right or wrong in supporting Obama. Given the choice of the three current candidates, however, I choose to raise my children in the America of President Obama. I don't make that decision lightly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, my take on the pastor deal: Obama was being totally honest and said as much as he thought the public could take on the subject&#8211;possibly more. I think he came to the church, learned about Jesus, believed&#8230;and eventually may have begun to notice that his pastor was talking about things outside the core truth of the Gospel (i.e. opinions on subjects independent of the Gospel) and disagreed with him. It could have been an epiphany (Wow, I never realized my pastor was a racist) or it could have been an unnoticeably gradual realization. I&#8217;m supposing that one of these would be the case, but I suspect that as Obama was developing his own opinions on the world he would come to church and hear the pastor proclaim the good news and love on the congregation, but also inject his political commentary. If Obama is anything like people I know, he could continue loving and respecting (for the most part) the pastor and continue being a member of his church, all while disagreeing on non-salvation-related subjects.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying Obama is or has been right to stick with the church &#038; former pastor. I&#8217;m saying I understand &#038; respect his explanation of things. If I&#8217;m being hoodwinked here, so be it. Time will prove whether I&#8217;m right or wrong in supporting Obama. Given the choice of the three current candidates, however, I choose to raise my children in the America of President Obama. I don&#8217;t make that decision lightly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dones</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-518</link>
		<author>Dones</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-518</guid>
					<description>Nik,

I like your discussion of the linguistic issue at hand. I find this scenario fascinating not only because I've never encountered a vowel change in English like this in my lifetime, but also because of the way it's been raised to my attention--namely, by a presidential candidate. Do you know of any literature on the subject (this particular word, if possible) that you could point me to?

Thanks to everyone so far for their great comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nik,</p>
<p>I like your discussion of the linguistic issue at hand. I find this scenario fascinating not only because I&#8217;ve never encountered a vowel change in English like this in my lifetime, but also because of the way it&#8217;s been raised to my attention&#8211;namely, by a presidential candidate. Do you know of any literature on the subject (this particular word, if possible) that you could point me to?</p>
<p>Thanks to everyone so far for their great comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-519</link>
		<author>Nik</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-519</guid>
					<description>Here is a blog on English, though an actual English textbook would be a better source… 
http://apprendre-anglais.blogspot.com/2005/12/how-do-you-pronounce-letter-i-in.html

Remember that  English as spoken and written in America seems to have taken on a life of its own. Spellings such as color, check, and gray, are the products of many years of misspelling to the point that they are now accepted forms of the words. The same could be said of pronunciation, with the example of the word schedule, which properly would be said shed*yule, and not sked*yule.  

The only point I have on Barack’s speech, would be that he used two different pronunciations.  Where some would like to say this is a gaffe like President Bush’s, I would quickly disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a blog on English, though an actual English textbook would be a better source…<br />
<a href="http://apprendre-anglais.blogspot.com/2005/12/how-do-you-pronounce-letter-i-in.html" rel="nofollow">http://apprendre-anglais.blogspot.com/2005/12/how-do-you-pronounce-letter-i-in.html</a></p>
<p>Remember that  English as spoken and written in America seems to have taken on a life of its own. Spellings such as color, check, and gray, are the products of many years of misspelling to the point that they are now accepted forms of the words. The same could be said of pronunciation, with the example of the word schedule, which properly would be said shed*yule, and not sked*yule.  </p>
<p>The only point I have on Barack’s speech, would be that he used two different pronunciations.  Where some would like to say this is a gaffe like President Bush’s, I would quickly disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rox</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-520</link>
		<author>rox</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-520</guid>
					<description>i have heard it both ways and here's an example of it being pronounced &lt;a&gt;both ways&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have heard it both ways and here&#8217;s an example of it being pronounced <a>both ways</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rox</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-521</link>
		<author>rox</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-521</guid>
					<description>(to the moderator: if that link to that comment didn't work)

the pronounciation can be found here: http://aolsvc.merriam-webster.aol.com/dictionary/divisively</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(to the moderator: if that link to that comment didn&#8217;t work)</p>
<p>the pronounciation can be found here: <a href="http://aolsvc.merriam-webster.aol.com/dictionary/divisively" rel="nofollow">http://aolsvc.merriam-webster.aol.com/dictionary/divisively</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dones</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-522</link>
		<author>Dones</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-522</guid>
					<description>Hmm, it doesn't say if it's a localization or not. But thank you very much for posting that link, Rox. At least it shows Obama didn't create the new pronunciation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, it doesn&#8217;t say if it&#8217;s a localization or not. But thank you very much for posting that link, Rox. At least it shows Obama didn&#8217;t create the new pronunciation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isabel</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-523</link>
		<author>isabel</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-523</guid>
					<description>All the time, dude. I say it like that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the time, dude. I say it like that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isabel</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-524</link>
		<author>isabel</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-524</guid>
					<description>You're not the only one with questions:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_03/013353.php

I think the short i version is from across the pond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not the only one with questions:<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_03/013353.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_03/013353.php</a></p>
<p>I think the short i version is from across the pond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dones</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-525</link>
		<author>Dones</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 05:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-525</guid>
					<description>Thanks, Isabel. My favorite comment there was the following: "It used to be div-EYE-sive but 9/11 changed everything." Hee-hee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Isabel. My favorite comment there was the following: &#8220;It used to be div-EYE-sive but 9/11 changed everything.&#8221; Hee-hee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dones</title>
		<link>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-526</link>
		<author>Dones</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metamorphilia.com/2008/03/pronunciation-of-divisive.html#comment-526</guid>
					<description>Also linked in the article Isabel referred to: http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/03/16/over_involved/
(Check out the second half of the article)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also linked in the article Isabel referred to: <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/03/16/over_involved/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/03/16/over_involved/</a><br />
(Check out the second half of the article)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
